“Your strengths have the capacity to become so dominant that they render your limitations irrelevant.” - Dr. Lance Watson
In my last blog From Tension to Empowerment – Creating a Smart Tribe I planned to share ideas on Collective Intelligence from Amy K author of The Secrets Leaders Keep. In my executive coaching meeting with my customer, Lee, who suggested I meet with Amy K, our discussion focused on how Lee is a freak. By being a freak he endemically imbeds his strengths of character into his organization.
Amplification
In Randall’s book The Freak Factor David shares some unorthodox views on strengths and weaknesses. One of the questions he asks is, “What would happen if you started exaggerating the characteristics that others tell you to repair?”
In my meeting with Lee I asked him this question. His response, “I’d be less annoyed because I’d get to what I want. Others would probably be more annoyed.”
Lee is a stickler for organization and systems. He is the person primarily responsible for the idea offered in Raising the Bar on Accountability. This blog offered thee questions to ask when reviewing the WWW accountability tool we provide our customers in the Rockefeller Habits.
Questions continually arose when reviewing uncompleted accountabilities in our weekly meetings:
These are the questions Lee and his team came up with to further assure uncompleted accountabilities would be addressed and completed in the future.
In subsequent meetings missed accountabilities were given the scrutiny of these three questions. Lee remains the sternest advocate of asking these questions. At times it may seem the task is frivolous and doesn’t require this scrutiny, yet Lee is adamant. The reason for establishing the questions is to assure something important isn’t missed and consequences are avoided by missing a critical accountability.
Lee’s strength in this case, or what others might view as something he needs to repair, is simply over the top on, provides a strength in this setting. It’s perhaps no coincidence that since these standards have been applied the Lee’s business is achieving record revenue growth.
Dudley exaggerates this aspect of his character when others might suggest we’ve done this enough, we don’t need to continually repeat this practice at every meeting.
Yet because Dudley has been so consistent in his approach, every one of his leadership team knows these Core Principles of Fleck Sales intimately. They in turn pass this same consistent approach on to the teams who report to them.
Mike Schulte pointed out the importance of these strategies recently after Fleck had made a major purchase of another distributer in Eldridge, Iowa.
This tenacity of focus for both Lee and Dudley may exaggerate characteristics others might feel need repaired.
In Lee’s case this same determination, indeed his tendency to not be afraid to explore and push his strengths led him to ask the question about how IFTI could improve and increase the capacity of the Collective Intelligence of their weekly meetings. While Amy K’s presentation to a group Lee attended ignited his exploration, Lee is and has been a proponent to making sure half of ever weekly meeting is dedicated to Collective Intelligence. It is for IFTI and for most other business, the most productive part of your weekly meeting. If it works for 45 minutes, wouldn’t 15 minutes or more provide even more benefit?
That is what we will explore in our next blog. How to make Collective Intelligence more impactful in your weekly meetings? Join us next blog as we examine ideas for Amy K’s book The Secrets Leaders Keep as well as insights from Verne and Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos.